Four Views of Hell Essay

These four professors argue the following calculates of perdition literal, metaphoric, purgatorial and conditional interpretations. This sustain peers inside the distinguishable theories of funny house, each of their relation to the sacred scripture and the evolution throughout time. apiece chapter begins with that qualityicular scholars reckon, followed by the re excepttal by his colleagues. Brief Summary The prime(prenominal) chapter is written by, John Walvoord, and he begins by providing the instauration for the literal view of nuthouse. The germ expends the greater part of this section of the agree describing these fundamental principles.He argues that funny farmhole is a position of perpetual penalisation for those who argon sinners in the Earth. He derives this view from native translations of the discussion using both the Old and New Testaments. Walvoord but takes the words from the Bibles predictions and the absolute inerrancy of the Bible to suggest that this is the and way to view blazing and eternal punishment. The chapter concludes with the beginning using the literal view to encourage the reviewer to help large number stay off booby hatch and the painfulness, by preaching the Gospel of savior Christ. The second chapter is written by William V.Crockett and he has interpreted the metaphorical view of hellhole, as read in the Bible and studied by scholars. His view of hell is comparable to the preceding authors view it and differs in how the punishment will be administered to the lost. The author has strong Calvinsitic ties, in that he believes that the fortellings of the punishment of hell is non to be taken liter solelyy, but as a metaphor. Crockett further states that the reality of hell is indescribable with words and the words that ar contained in the Bible are that a disruption that the human mind can absorb.The chapter concludes with the author stating his lower for the conditional view. In the third chapter, Zachary J. Hayes takes on the subject of purgatory in the hell discussion. Purgatory in this parole is a enter where the dead will go, when they wear offt quite sterilize it to paradise, but are not bad enough for hell. Notably the author cannot find any scriptural references for purgatory, however he does state that the supposition of purgatory evolved from a in-person customs that the Catholic Church adopted. Hayes does as well place that he agrees with the metaphorical view of hell.In fourthly chapter of the book is written by Dr. Clark Pinnock on the conditional view of hell. The conditional view is in addition referred to as annihilation, which means that hell will be a punishment of fire and lead to utter demolition of sinners. The actual destruction is the punishment, not the fire itself. Pinnock, uses assorted scriptures that meet his claim of everlasting death and divinitys moral values. Critical interaction with the authors work The authors goal of this boo k is to wee an educated as nearly as Biblical look at the different versions of hell.Although the word is talked most many times, but the authors aim is to give people all(a) the information available on the subject. later on(prenominal) which the reader can make personal conclusion virtually their own personal truth. The authors do discover his goal of f very representing the literal, metaphorical, purgatorial and conditional interpretations of hell. Each author has not imposed his personal look or view of hell, but however state the facts from Biblical and theological sources.Also, having each author gauge the different authors arguments shows potential fallacies in each and gives the reader information to further reflect, evaluate and draw personal conclusions. The strengths of this book would be starting time, the book was written by students of the word who supported the majority of their arguments with scripture first and with theology second. In the literal view of hell the author comes directly from scriptures and uses those scriptures to plainly paint a picture that we commit already been taught since childhood.In the metaphorical argument of hell the author uses scriptures that show support the claim that the descriptions of hell are only be used as metaphors and not to be interpreted literally. The chapter on the conditional view of hell is well written and covers the punishment and destruction parts of hell thoroughly. The first weakness that we encounter in this book is the fact that in the literal view of hell the author does not address the issue of why the scriptures must be taken literally, instead of figuratively.In the metaphorical view of hell the author neer addresses the issue of what will actually be, nor does he endeavor to answer questions that seem to violate the traits of God. The author in the conditional view of hell uses much of his authorship to appeal to the human senses and not to justify those emotions or tone ings with scriptures. In the view on purgatory the author spends very little to no time talking astir(predicate) hell, but the time that is between heaven and hell. Although purgatory is the median(prenominal) between heaven and hell the author seems to tenseness on how the soul can make it to heaven and not the latter.In my opinion I feel that this book would not be suitable for all lay persons to read. I feel that this book would be of best use in the hands of all persons who teach in the church. This book would not only give them basis for what they believe in, but it would in addition give them the opportunity to understand the contradictions in several(a) beliefs. I feel that this book could be a useful tool to teach about sin. Although the authors have different views on what hell will actually be like, but it does hold one idea in agreement.Hell is a real place it, and sinners will be there. After some look for there seem to be many other books that are written about h ell. Those other books, after reading summaries, take a similar access code and try to inform the reader what hell is passage to be like and what it is not going to be. umteen of those books not only deal with hell, but they also address heaven as well with the kindred level of concern. Conclusion In conclusion the book The four views of hell, the author does achieve his goal.However I feel that the chapter on purgatory did not fit in the book, because the argument was not supported by scriptures and does not necessary classify itself as hell. The book does make thing a little bit about heaven, but more about sin. This book points the leaf back to the place where we need not only teach about heaven, but teach also about hell. Many people get lost in the mind frame that there is only heaven or life on earth.